Your question answered: Why eHarmony rejected you

A search for the phrase “eHarmony is based upon a complex matching system” (an excerpt of eHarmony’s rejection notice) in Technorati, a blog search engine, gives 50 hits in the last 45 days — This means that, once a day, someone is blogging that eH rejected them — that they flunked a personality test. At the same time, searching for “eHarmony reject” in Google gives 39,000 hits.

There really is something irksome about being promised “someone who will love you for who you are” and then getting a boilerplate rejection notice.

“Unable to match you at this time” — so what does this mean?

What irritates us about the boilerplate reason, which has been unchanged since 2000 when eH launched, is that it loves to be vague. We at eHarmony Blog hate vagueness, so, for you, we did some research.

Here is the most complete checklist of reasons why eHarmony rejected you:

Reason #1. You said you are separated or married on page 1. 30% of eHarmony rejects fall into this category, according to a May 2007 article in the Washington Post.

Reason #2. You said you are below 20 on page 1. 27% percent fall into this category.

Reason #3. You said you were married more than twice on page 1.1 “EHarmony also rejects anyone younger than 60 who’s been married more than four times,” according to the Washington Post article.

The cursed test still lets you go through all questions even if it knows on page 1 that it will reject you. And, look, it even has the irony to say, “If we find that we will not be able to match a user using these profiles, we feel it is only fair to inform them early in the process.”

Reason #4. Your answers don’t tally, i.e., (a) you clicked randomly or (b) for example, you put “1″ under Aloof on page 1, but checked “Outgoing” on page 6. 9% of rejects fall into this category.

Reason #5. You scored low on the following traits — eHarmony calls them dimensions:

  • Self-Concept (how you perceive yourself)
  • Emotional Status (feeling happy, fulfilled and hopeful)
  • Character (honesty and trustworthiness)
  • Obstreperousness (the black hole dimension)
  • Character (honesty and trustworthiness)2
  • Emotion Management: Anger (expressing negative emotions constructively)
  • Conflict Resolution (resolving issues).
  • Family Background (happy childhood and supportiveness of your parents)

If you remember, there are entire SECTIONS in the test exactly to ask if you have ill feelings in the last month, how you handle arguments and how good your relationship is with your parents. If a registrant just left an abusive relationship and she revealed her feelings in the test, well, instead of saying, “Sorry but you’re not emotionally ready to get married. We’d like to tell you what you need to work on, but we’re not your therapist,” eH rejects the registrant.

So what do I do next?

We want to tell you to open another yahoo or hotmail account today and retake the test, but we can’t. Instead we offer a gentle suggestion. May we suggest that you take a break first from seeking committed relationships. We mean, enjoy being single again (or for now).

[added after RG's comment below] Or we could be wrong. It’s possible that eHarmony is not for you. There’s nothing wrong with you; it’s just that the eH system was designed for a certain profile of people and match them for marriage — it isn’t ready for someone like you yet.

DO NOT read this as a judgement that there is no one out there for you. You know best what is best for you. DO NOT let the above generalisations discourage you from desiring and working towards a lifetime loving commitment with another person. If the above reasons do not apply, then we invite you to retake the test, now or after a few weeks or months. [/added]

Without sounding “holier than thou”, try this idea for size: If you’ve joined an matrimonial matchmaking site, would you want matches who are emotionally ready to be married? Would you like to be matched to someone who reveals psychological or emotional problems?

What do you think?

Check out our May 2007 poll: Do you agree with eHarmony rejecting people?

Comments 114

  1. Kelly wrote:

    Yes! As someone who has suffered from anxiety and depression on and off, is honest about, and has been in ongoing therapy, I would like to meet someone who understands this kind of emotional “instability”, whether in themselves or in someone close to them. Eharmony hasn’t seemed to pick up on the recent recharacterizing of depression as a medical problem, not a character flaw dooming its sufferer to lifelong loneliness.

    Posted 21 Feb 2007 at 5:59 pm
  2. Francesca wrote:

    Am I the only one who despises the whole concept of E-Harmony? I would never ever whore myself out there like that. I think the SNL spoof really hit the nail on the head where they advertised finding you someone “exactly like you but with different sexual organs.” I never got the point anyway of finding someone exactly like you. It’s those who are different from you that challenge you and help you grow. I keep thinking that it’s because we’re such low conflict wimps that we even have this whole culture of divorce. Yeah the people plugging E-harmony in their ads are happy now, but differences will come and that’s the test of a relationship-but this whole mentality seems to advocate tossing someone out the moment someone has a difficulty and become inconvenient. All of this is too self-serving to be love and seems pointless.

    Modern culture is so determined to suck the romance and mystery out of every last vestige of traditional culture.

    Posted 13 Apr 2007 at 11:45 am
  3. Francesca wrote:

    I read the criteria or reasons for why they rejected this poor person. Who would score well on that?! What kind of New Age positive police bubble do these Eharmony drones live in. They must be awfully boring. I thought loving someone meant that you loved them and supported when they had trouble and pain-isn’t that the point-not when they were perfect for you. Although I think you’d have to have low self-esteem to do any of this online dating crap.

    Posted 13 Apr 2007 at 11:52 am
  4. Ally wrote:

    Well, eharmony didn’t reject the person who had a sex change operation. They matched me with the formerly fellow female and then acted as if I should be grateful. I’d rather date someone divorced or with anxiety/depression problems than this match I had to work so hard to get rid of because they were so clingy, scary and “emotionally fragile” from our first communication. (I didn’t find out about the sex change until open communication.)

    Posted 03 May 2007 at 4:36 am
  5. Rob Gordon wrote:

    Re: “Instead we offer a gentle suggestion. May we suggest that you take a break first from seeking committed relationships”

    What an INCREDIBLY RUDE response! It is obvious that eHarmony rejects people who don’t fit the right wing Christian views of its founder – who Jay Leno calls “that creepy guy”. He is also an extremely dishonest business man- for one saying he has made more matches than anyone else. I’m glad Match called him on that one, and also his claim that their ridiculous personality profile is a “forty dollar value” – if that is true, shouldn’t he give that as a refund to anyone who was rejected?

    I operate an membership-based portal and I can’t imagine making people ask hundreds of personal questions and then rejecting them – I would expect, and probably deserve a lawsuit for this. Yes, I am an eharmony reject- and though I was hurt and angry at the rudeness of this system, I have since met several other extremely cool people who were also “rejected by eharmony.” I also know people who say the people in eharmony are “a bunch of losers”. Since I wasn’t allowed in this system, I don’t know if this is true, but a friend of mine who is rather short signed up for the service, and then just got reject letter after reject letter from women who didn’t like his height. Apparently, eharmony didn’t take this into account, but they seemed to delight in sending him rejecting messages everyday. After wasting several months of time and money, he didn’t meet a single person and I know he was hurt by all the rejection messages.

    My conclusion: that Neil Clark Warren guy must be a sick sadistic jerk – and if you guys have any contacts with that organization by all means tell him I said so – and feel completely free to publish my name.

    Sincerely

    Rob Gordon

    p.s. Anyone into a class action lawsuit against these guys? No one would make any money but we could stop them from wasting people’s time (the greatest sin) and hurting people with his sick system.

    Posted 10 May 2007 at 12:31 am
  6. eharmonyblog wrote:

    Hi Rob:
    Thank you for the feedback. To encourage discussion I have two questions:

    (1) What’s the more constructive alternative to the rejection message (i.e., “Unable to match you at this time…”)?

    (2) If you say don’t show this rejection message (i.e., let everybody in), then how about this: The fact is that the questionnaire tests for Self-Concept (how you perceive yourself) and denies the service to those who reveal that they are low in this trait. Do you propose that the questionnaire stop testing for Self-Concept?

    Posted 10 May 2007 at 3:36 am
  7. Rob Gordon wrote:

    Yes, what is wrong with saying “unable to match at this time”? I have a business portal that also produces matches based on professionals international business interests. If I don’t have a match for them, then I just don’t have a match at the moment — I don’t send them a rude message essentially saying that we consider them to be losers and they will never make an international business deal — that would be beyond arrogant.

    I still have no idea why I was rejected (and I certainly don’t want an account now) – I am not married or anything like that, I’m pretty happy and excited by some things going on in my life right now, and I am honest to a fault — and my family background is fine — but what an incredibly rude reason to reject someone. Many people who come from broken families go on to live very positive lives and have positive relationships.

    If anyone has any “issues” it is certainly Dr Neil Clark Warren. He obviously is a sick sadist and eHarmony seems to reflect the values of a small minded bigot (and if “honesty” is really a criteria, he OBVIOUSLY wouldn’t qualify for his own system). It is unfortunate that Sequoia Capital and other VC firms would fund such a system and I strongly encourage anyone who is paying this company to drop their memberships so they are not supporting this right wing service. I also think the Match/Chemistry deserves a lot of credit for drawing attention to the sick policies of eHarmony. If Neil Clark Warren wants a system that screens out people who are not on the religious right, then he should just say that. Please, tell your “well adjusted” friends not to support this system with paid memberships.

    Rob Gordon

    p.s. I don’t have to look up the link right now, but check out what people say on the Better Business and other consumer protection sites. My friend who got nothing from eHarmony but dozens of rejection messages because he is short. You will find HUNDREDS of messages from people who feel they have been ripped off by eHarmony and Dr. Neil Clark Warren.

    Posted 10 May 2007 at 9:27 am
  8. Jon wrote:

    @robgordon

    First off, before people jump to the conclusion – no, I’m not a EH shill.

    That said (and I can only base this off your posts), your sweeping generalizations and baseless characterizations are pretty telling, at least to me. “Methinks thou doth protest too much” is the phrase I’m thinking right now.

    In your previous post you say “It is obvious that eHarmony rejects people who don’t fit the right wing Christian views of its founder”. In your next post you say “I still have no idea why I was rejected.”

    So which is it? It sounds like you really just don’t know, and are throwing out accusations because you’re feeling rejected, which you yourself admit. Then you go on to call the EH guy a sick sadist.

    Let’s recap: 1. EH rejected you. 2. You have no idea why. 3. EH guy must be a sadist.

    The EH rejection letter is brief and general in nature because could you imagine the response from rejected users if they were told something to the effect of “Sorry, but our tests indicate you might be severely depressed…”?

    I googled the rejection notice just now and really, I don’t find it rude at all. In fact they apologize because THEY can’t make their service work for you. They put the blame on themselves for the failure, they don’t blame the person on the other side of the screen.

    This seems to me to be the classic case of someone interpreting any bad news which comes about as a negative reflection of themselves.

    Posted 12 May 2007 at 7:47 pm
  9. Jon wrote:

    @francesca

    Like Rob Gordon, you’re making a number of false assumptions and then jumping to conclusions. I have never seen anything even implied that EH’s concept is to match me up with someone who’s my identical twin or whatever. They claim to have a system which attempts to find people who are compatible, that’s all.

    And even then, there’s multiple question and answer phases you go through – a directed “getting to know you” phase (which you can request to skip if you want). I’ve closed many matches during the communication process because I didn’t feel there was anything there.

    Anyway, my point in posting this is just to set the facts straight. Any time someone asks the question “Does eharmony suck” the inevitable response is something EXTREMELY negative from someone who got rejected for the service and now wants to “get even” by throwing out a bunch of baseless accusations.

    Posted 12 May 2007 at 8:06 pm
  10. Rob Gordon wrote:

    Francesca wrote:
    “Am I the only one who despises the whole concept of E-Harmony? I would never ever whore myself out there like that. I think the SNL spoof really hit the nail on the head where they advertised finding you someone “exactly like you but with different sexual organs.””

    Right on Francesca! I’m sure there are a lot of cool people on eHarmony- but the people in their commercials seem like moonies. It wasn’t until I was rejected from this service that I started researching this and learned about the terrible values of the founder- he is a crony of the Dobson “Focus on the Family” crowd. This service would have died a natural death- or would have remained a niche site for conservative Christians- had it not been for the foolish moves of some venture capital firms. I was mostly wondering about the business ethics of that Dr. Neil guy who makes people spend upwards of an hour filling out highly personal questions- which he claims is a “40 dollar value” then basically says- screw you- you ain’t getting nothing.

    Shortly after this happened, I spoke to several members of the system who felt they had been ripped off- and they told me I absolutely wasn’t missing anything.

    Rob

    Posted 12 May 2007 at 10:55 pm
  11. Rob Gordon wrote:

    Ally wrote:
    “Well, eharmony didn’t reject the person who had a sex change operation. They matched me with the formerly fellow female and then acted as if I should be grateful. I’d rather date someone divorced or with anxiety/depression problems than this match I had to work so hard to get rid of because they were so clingy, scary and “emotionally fragile” from our first communication”

    Too funny Ally! As I mentioned, they decided the ideal match for my 5′6″ male friend were women 5′10″ or taller. They set their “alerts” so that he would get rejecting notices every time they passed on him. I know something about the design of social networks – and I do think it is likely that Neil Clark Warren is a sadist or has some other mental problem. If his business and web service is built with these sick values, shouldn’t we assume some of these same sick values got into his test, and his “29 dimensions of compatibility” – or whatever it is.

    Rob

    Posted 12 May 2007 at 11:10 pm
  12. Rob Gordon wrote:

    Jon wrote:
    “@francesca Like Rob Gordon, you’re making a number of false assumptions and then jumping to conclusions… Anyway, my point in posting this is just to set the facts straight. Any time someone asks the question “Does eharmony suck” the inevitable response is something EXTREMELY negative from someone who got rejected for the service and now wants to “get even” by throwing out a bunch of baseless accusations.”

    Isn’t that EXACTLY what you are doing? The “accusations” aren’t baseless at all – I spent an hour of my time for this “$40 dollar value” and when I got ripped off I got curious if other people also felt like they had been scammed by this company – and it didn’t take much research to find that answer was a resounding yes. This was before the commercials came on, and I felt even more insulted – this guy who had rejected me was now on TV talking about “values” and he did seem creepy to me (he reminded me a bit of that Heavens Gate founder who led the mass suicide of his followers here in San Diego). Then I checked into his background – and he is from the Christian right – and the system was built with an early base of evangelical Christians –

    You wanted to “get the facts straight” – those are the FACTS. It’s true, we don’t know what Warren’s algorithm is, but we know he has designed mean-spirited and even sadistic values into his system – like the rejection messages my friend kept getting because he was short (until he couldn’t take it and canceled the service) – those are the real “values” that Warren has designed into his system. So I certainly wouldn’t trust this man – or his test to help pick a mate for life. The system is likely designed to produce his version of ideal evangelical Christian marriages. That would be fine if the product was labeled as such – and I assume Jon, that this is what you really want – but for those not of this orientation this is false advertising. Neil Clark Warren has ripped off every person he has rejected after taking an hour or so of their time – that is absolutely criminal in my opinion, and he should pay that “$40 dollar value” to every single person he has rejected.

    RG

    Posted 13 May 2007 at 12:01 am
  13. Jon wrote:

    @Rob Gordon

    My conclusions were based on what you wrote, nothing more. Your opinions, as well as Francesca’s are based on wild assumptions and illogical conclusions based on those wild assumptions.

    Again I reiterate. 1. You got turned down for their service. 2. You don’t really know why (though you speculate wildly). 3. You’ve come to the conclusion that the guy who runs it is a sadistic whack job, and now you’re trying to convince others to think the same thing.

    I don’t see how you were “ripped off”. Because you “spent” an hour of your time to take a free online personality test? I don’t understand that at all.

    Amazingly my opinion of EH has actually IMPROVED as a result of this exchange and this message board. If EH is effectively screening out people who, when faced with a bit of negative news or criticism, jump to character assasination and wild speculation, then I think they are doing at least something right.

    Posted 13 May 2007 at 8:33 am
  14. Worked for Me wrote:

    Just stumbled into this discussion after searching “rejected by eHarmony” in Google. No, I wasn’t rejected by eHarmony — I was curious about the match.com (?) banner ads I’ve seen all over the place that use that line as a come-on.

    I’m an atheist/agnostic (male, mid-30s, writer/designer) and had absolutely no trouble at all with eHarmony. It took about 4 months before the first hits came through, and I ended up making into the final round with three women. Two of them said up-front they wanted babies in the next 18 months. No kidding. Scary to me, but at least they were honest and we could go our separate ways.

    The one pairing that worked out with my profile is a gorgeous, younger woman who’s smart as hell, funny, and really is an excellent match in several areas that were not addressed in the questionnaire. We’ve been together 3 years, and we’re getting married this year.

    What can I say? The program worked for me.

    I have to note that eHarmony is nothing like Match, True, Lavalife, etc. It’s not there to go browsing for dates, which is why you can’t browse listings there. It’s explicitly a matrimonial matchmaking service. Everyone there is preloaded with that expectation.

    I have no idea why they reject people either, but presumably their ranks have swelled dramatically in the 3 years since I signed up with them. Based on some of the unsupportable and frankly paranoid responses here, I have to assume they’re doing something right.

    Posted 18 May 2007 at 3:13 pm
  15. kgregt wrote:

    To the guy who keeps chiding Rob for not knowing why he was rejected, that’s the point! Part of what’s so irritating about getting rejected is that they don’t tell you why. I think you should be told up front that there is an X% chance that you will be rejected. I agree that they should have to compensate you for the time you invest in it. The length of the survey is ridiculous. Don’t tell me that the “personality profile” is compensation. For one, that’s like handing someone a raincoat when they asked for an orange. If I wanted to buy a personality profile, I would have. For two, personality profiles are relatively useless- it just spits out information to you that you put in. I’m smart enough to know what my answers are going to make it say.

    As for the thing about it being right wing, I don’t know about that. I’m fairly right wing myself and don’t have any huge dealbreakers in my stats (I’m single, am over 21, no kids, don’t drink, I go to church, etc.)

    Regarding what it should say, the “at this time” thing frosted me. It basically means ever. It’s not like they save the thing and you can try again. All you could do is just go back in and lie about some of your answers, unless something markedly changed in your life.

    Posted 21 May 2007 at 9:23 am
  16. Chris10 wrote:

    I just want to say that the power of suggestion can have a heavy weight on you. I know from personal experience that the rejection letter at eharmony not only made my insecurities more intense…it gives off the idea that you are not made for a committed relationship. I have always been afraid of feeling trapped or stuck in a relationship because either you or the other person feels completely comfortable, or your lives become so entangled into eachother that you feel it impossible to escape. This doesn’t mean I haven’t had long term and meaningful relationships, it just means I have always tried to stay open and completely honest about mine and his emotions while in it. This, I know, stems from my mothers horribly unhappy 18 year marriage to a stepfather that seems completely incapable of love. All this being said I just protect myself. Not to say I will never ever get married, but that is not what I am on a mission for. I want to make a life for myself and have some enjoyable company to come along with me. I think the largest problem with this rejection letter is the fact that it shows how our society puts such a large importance on getting married. The idea that you find the other half to make a whole. Well I am whole, I am an individual, I am honest, fun and have no problem meeting people. I would like someone that I click with and enjoy being around, and definetly not just someone to fill a spot.

    Posted 07 Nov 2007 at 5:34 pm
  17. Steve Rogers wrote:

    I believe I waas rejected because I’m 45 and never marrried.

    Posted 21 Dec 2007 at 1:29 pm
  18. Jon wrote:

    I agree with the other poster that eharmony could be more upfront about the survey. They might emphasize the length of the survey and that completing it does not gaurantee the ability to use the service. That’s likely already in the disclaimer but emphasizing it couldn’t hurt.

    I don’t agree at all with this ridiculous notion that one should be compensated for taking it, assuming they’re rejected. In fact, believing you deserve compensation speaks volumes about you, in my opinion.

    When you go to a bar with the goal of meeting people but don’t get any phone numbers does the bar owe you?

    You make an investment in your personal life. Several things you do – anything from new clothes, to getting in shape, to new social activities, to overcoming social anxieties – may not necessarily produce a “return” and certainly not a gauranteed return. That’s a fact of life. This belief that if you do something you “deserve” some sort of gauranteed return is quite frankly immature.

    I can’t even imagine being in a relationship with someone like that. “I cooked you eggs so now you owe me.”

    This may in fact be why you were rejected. You’re too focused on YOU. You’re taking the “what’s in it for me?” attitude when the whole point of a relationship is sharing with someone else.

    Bottom line, if you’re not even willing to take a simple one hour survey and risk a bit of rejection, you don’t sound ready for a relationship.

    Posted 29 Dec 2007 at 10:50 am
  19. CC wrote:

    Jon – I think your problem is that you can’t recognize sarcasm. Lighten up. I’m pretty sure the comment about being compensated for taking the survey was a JOKE! Hello!

    Posted 29 Dec 2007 at 10:35 pm
  20. DJH wrote:

    The problem with eHarmony, AFAIK, is not that they reject some people. The problem is twofold:

    1. Their personality survey is very long, with many pages. If it disqualifies you early in the process, it should tell you … at THAT time … rather than forcing you through the whole thing needlessly.
    2. If it rejects you, it should be clear as to WHY you were rejected. What, exactly, tripped you up? If the reason is that you’re neurotic, it should just say so. (If it sounds cruel to bluntly tell an emotionally-fragile person that s/he’s emotionally-fragile and can’t be matched, consider that NOT telling an emotionally-fragile person the reason for rejection, leaving them to wonder what’s wrong with them, is probably MORE cruel.)

    What it really boils down to is simple courtesy. If someone has gone through the time and effort required to complete their personality test, eHarmony owes that person just a little more consideration than just to say, “Woops, too bad, can’t help you, go away.” I’m not sure why courtesy is too much to ask, but I guess it is.

    Posted 07 Jan 2008 at 7:07 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published, shown nor shared.

In case it isn’t obvious, we are not eHarmony. Your message will not be sent to them, and no, we cannot help you with your account.

Unmoderated: Comments appear after two to five seconds. Have your own topic? Start a new discussion. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting