Your question answered: Why eHarmony rejected you

A search for the phrase “eHarmony is based upon a complex matching system” (an excerpt of eHarmony’s rejection notice) in Technorati, a blog search engine, gives 50 hits in the last 45 days — This means that, once a day, someone is blogging that eH rejected them — that they flunked a personality test. At the same time, searching for “eHarmony reject” in Google gives 39,000 hits.

There really is something irksome about being promised “someone who will love you for who you are” and then getting a boilerplate rejection notice.

“Unable to match you at this time” — so what does this mean?

What irritates us about the boilerplate reason, which has been unchanged since 2000 when eH launched, is that it loves to be vague. We at eHarmony Blog hate vagueness, so, for you, we did some research.

Here is the most complete checklist of reasons why eHarmony rejected you:

Reason #1. You said you are separated or married on page 1. 30% of eHarmony rejects fall into this category, according to a May 2007 article in the Washington Post.

Reason #2. You said you are below 20 on page 1. 27% percent fall into this category.

Reason #3. You said you were married more than twice on page 1.1 “EHarmony also rejects anyone younger than 60 who’s been married more than four times,” according to the Washington Post article.

The cursed test still lets you go through all questions even if it knows on page 1 that it will reject you. And, look, it even has the irony to say, “If we find that we will not be able to match a user using these profiles, we feel it is only fair to inform them early in the process.”

Reason #4. Your answers don’t tally, i.e., (a) you clicked randomly or (b) for example, you put “1″ under Aloof on page 1, but checked “Outgoing” on page 6. 9% of rejects fall into this category.

Reason #5. You scored low on the following traits — eHarmony calls them dimensions:

  • Self-Concept (how you perceive yourself)
  • Emotional Status (feeling happy, fulfilled and hopeful)
  • Character (honesty and trustworthiness)
  • Obstreperousness (the black hole dimension)
  • Character (honesty and trustworthiness)2
  • Emotion Management: Anger (expressing negative emotions constructively)
  • Conflict Resolution (resolving issues).
  • Family Background (happy childhood and supportiveness of your parents)

If you remember, there are entire SECTIONS in the test exactly to ask if you have ill feelings in the last month, how you handle arguments and how good your relationship is with your parents. If a registrant just left an abusive relationship and she revealed her feelings in the test, well, instead of saying, “Sorry but you’re not emotionally ready to get married. We’d like to tell you what you need to work on, but we’re not your therapist,” eH rejects the registrant.

So what do I do next?

We want to tell you to open another yahoo or hotmail account today and retake the test, but we can’t. Instead we offer a gentle suggestion. May we suggest that you take a break first from seeking committed relationships. We mean, enjoy being single again (or for now).

[added after RG's comment below] Or we could be wrong. It’s possible that eHarmony is not for you. There’s nothing wrong with you; it’s just that the eH system was designed for a certain profile of people and match them for marriage — it isn’t ready for someone like you yet.

DO NOT read this as a judgement that there is no one out there for you. You know best what is best for you. DO NOT let the above generalisations discourage you from desiring and working towards a lifetime loving commitment with another person. If the above reasons do not apply, then we invite you to retake the test, now or after a few weeks or months. [/added]

Without sounding “holier than thou”, try this idea for size: If you’ve joined an matrimonial matchmaking site, would you want matches who are emotionally ready to be married? Would you like to be matched to someone who reveals psychological or emotional problems?

What do you think?

Check out our May 2007 poll: Do you agree with eHarmony rejecting people?

Comments 114

  1. SingleGuyInNC wrote:

    “Do opposites attract or do people who are similar?”

    Opposite initially attract and then they attack, to quote Warren’s books. Those that are still wondering what makes eH tick, the books offer plenty of explanations for your questions. I’ve seen excerpts of the books on the site itself and on eH Advice, so it’s pretty safe to say, that the books are required reading for the serious eH user that is in it for the long-haul.

    “I remain convinced that if we get the hang of online dating we do a MUCH better job selecting our own partners online, thank you.”

    I think that the more people you get to know, the more experiences you have and the better you are at determining those aspects in others that you desire or loathe. The off-line dater attains this through lots of dates (bad dates?) and conversations. It also helps to spend some time to get to really get to know yourself before trying to select a partner, something that I think the typical off-line dater doesn’t do much of (gross stereotyping ahead) since they tend to go from relationship to relationship just to not be alone.

    Posted 20 Jun 2008 at 10:52 am
  2. Scot McKay wrote:

    @S.G.I.N.C.

    Well, I agree with all of your sentiments.

    I’m not ready to pronounce divine infallibility upon the e-Harmony guy just yet though.

    Posted 20 Jun 2008 at 11:17 am
  3. Shar wrote:

    “Lena wrote:
    Could also be age or education. I’m 40, never married, stable, travel a lot, volunteer lots, but also have a PhD. EHarmony wouldn’t touch that!”

    Really?

    I’m nearly 50, never married, stable, travel a lot, volunteer lots, and have a PhD in Finance. I’m extremely picky about my matches education level. It must meet or exceed my own; and I am never at a loss for matches.

    Maybe if you wait a few more years until you are a bit older, they will touch you, lol.

    Posted 20 Jun 2008 at 8:44 pm
  4. Shar wrote:

    Scot,

    I DID look at the comments following yours, and you said “I’d love to see where the reference for that policy change is.”

    My post told you exactly where it is: in the “match flexibility” section.

    Posted 20 Jun 2008 at 8:47 pm
  5. SingleGuyInNC wrote:

    @Scot

    I think what he says makes sense (in his books). I’m willing to bet that other reputable relationship psychologists/psychiatrists would also say similar things about looking past the surface and the trivial stuff to find deeper compatibility.

    Initially, I was all about drinking the eHarmony “Kool-Aid” and that NCW was “the man” and how much better eH had to be than the alternatives. I’m more skeptical and open to alternative method/ideology on the relationships (and just about everything) these days.

    Posted 21 Jun 2008 at 10:48 am
  6. Shar wrote:

    In my experience, being matched with a group of people who are already compatable with me at the “deeper levels” and slogging through them to (eventually) find someone with whom I feel the necessary chemistry is the way to go.

    I’ve spent far too many months and years in relationships only to find out something about my partners quote unquote core values that is the polar opposite of mine that no amount of conversation or questioning beforehand would have truthfully revealed. Other times I have compromised on a known core value difference because I was so happy with other aspects of the relationship. Those relationships never work.

    Yes, “time will tell”, but some of us aren’t 22 any more and don’t have that kind of time. Breaking up two or three years into a relationship is a lot different when you are older.

    Yeah, it is kind of like standing at the luggage carousel at the airport and waiting for your bag to appear … but the feeling of knowing that all the real core basics that people misrepresent, play along with until push comes to shove, etc are already similar to yours really makes it worth it for me.

    I also thnk that the price deters serial daters and dating junkies. Not that there aren’t nice people anywhere else … but I think the majority of people who pay eHarmony’s fee fall into the “I’m serious about finding the right person for me” category.

    Posted 21 Jun 2008 at 2:43 pm
  7. Shar wrote:

    And in other news …. I just spoke with a friend of mine in California.

    Her son, age 45, has been on eHarmony for two years and just brought his fiance home to meet her.

    They met on eHarmony.

    Posted 22 Jun 2008 at 7:34 pm
  8. SingleGuyInNC wrote:

    Shar: Any way you can pry some statistics out of him? Like how many matches he had over that period of time and how many “frogs” did he go out with in those two years?

    Posted 24 Jun 2008 at 11:43 am
  9. Shar wrote:

    I’ll send his mom an e-mail and ask her to ask him for me. Or better yet, have him contact me.

    I’ll let you know what he says.

    Posted 24 Jun 2008 at 11:59 am
  10. Fred Wilkins wrote:

    I need e harmonys phone number

    Posted 19 Jul 2008 at 11:05 am
  11. Becky wrote:

    The thing that bothers me the most about the rejection is just how final it is. I’m 27, never married, I have people tell me all the time that they just can’t understand why I haven’t found someone yet (too many female fish and not enough males in a small pond, I guess). I’m not mentally unstable, and I’ve taken a long enough break from the dating scene that I’ve had my time to enjoy being single and I’d really like my chance to get out of that now. It just seems to me that once eHarmony deems you unable to be matched, that’s it. There’s no second chances, unless you go back with a completely different email and change all your answers. I wish they’d take into account that people can go through some rough spots, sure, but just because someone isn’t ready to be matched at that time, perhaps, doesn’t mean that six months or a year down the road, after having time to work on themselves and strengthen those areas that they’re weak in, they still won’t be ready. After all, the Christian faith that the site was built around and successful relationships both rely a lot on grace and second chances. I wish eHarmony would be willing to grant that.

    Posted 28 Jul 2008 at 4:37 pm
  12. Jon wrote:

    Shar, I’m not trying to put you down but there is seriously something wrong if it takes 2 or 3 years to see a problem in the other person’s core values. eharmony or any other dating site is not going to cure that situation, I’m afraid.

    Becky, there are plenty of ways to meet people. Don’t put much weight on eharmony. I was on it for a year and it’s not all it’s cracked up to be. I got pretty much the same results using okcupid and plenty of fish. But here’s the most important part – I’ve had the BEST luck when I meet people in person and not via a dating site.

    I don’t have as many social opportunities these days so I joined some local groups. Some I found through friends, some via craigslist and some via meetup.com. Even if I don’t meet someone, I go because I’m interested in the subject matter first and foremost. I meet people with similar interests and personalities since we’re there for the same thing.

    As for eharmony, the vast majority of women I met were hardcore husband shopping. The dates felt like interviews. It was exhausting and no fun.

    And compatible? Puhleeze. I would say I was somewhat compatible with three or four of the twenty or so I went out with. You can get that success rate in any bar.

    I’ve seen some wierdos succesfully screened by EH, but I think their compatability system is a complete fraud. They keep trickling matches to you to keep you signed up but whether or not you’re compatable doesn’t seem to be a factor.

    Posted 28 Jul 2008 at 6:36 pm
  13. Dr. Love wrote:

    I heard a lot about how people get rejected by eharmony. Apparently they have decided they will try to give you a second chance. Just spend another hour filling out a another survey and you might be allowed in afterall. After doing some searching I found this website that is trying to collect all those “rejects” – http://www.bemyeharmonyreject.com/dating/. It’s too bad that eharmony has to treat people the way they do. Where’s the love for everyone?

    Posted 08 Sep 2008 at 4:52 pm
  14. Lilpooh wrote:

    OK. Are you people serious? First, it’s FREE!! If you don’t like it, don’t do it. Next, you know the guy is a Christian, what did you think, he’d be all gunho to setup the Gay&Lesibian community. And another thing, if you’re butt is separated or married, handle your business of the failed marriage before you go looking for recruits. I’ve use the use and was not happy with the matches and left. Stop giving my money to a clause I thought was a waste of my hard earned money.

    Novel ideal isn’t it. Try it folks and you’ll be better off. Oh and Rob, Dude you do sound alittle bitter Let it go. It’s a website. Would you want to burn down or bad talk a Bar where you had no luck? Get over it. This is SO not the point.

    Posted 04 Dec 2008 at 6:35 am
  15. Aly wrote:

    I have to admit I was diheartened to receive an “unable to match you at this time”, and will be completely honest: I believe it’s because I am rather sad right now. I got out of a 5 year relationship 3 months ago, and now it is the holiday season. I think many people would be less than hopeful in this case. I can see why one would suggest waiting to get involved with someone else after such a blow, but isn’t the point of one of these sites to open doors to meet new people that will ultimately provide a deep happiness to both parties in the long run??? And yet it is the people most longing for companionship that are turned away, only adding to their despair.

    Posted 21 Dec 2008 at 8:34 pm
  16. Jon wrote:

    Aly, try Plentyoffish.com or okcupid. They’re free and just as good as eharmony. In fact, I think they’re actually better.

    Posted 23 Dec 2008 at 8:13 am
  17. SingleGuyInNC wrote:

    Jon:
    That has not been my personal experience but I do believe that you can find a suitable life partner elsewhere if you keep the methodology NCW wrote in his books in mind when you “screen applicants”.

    Quantcast numbers for okcupid are pretty low (less than 1 million for the US). I rarely find anyone worth messaging on there. It is free and folks still don’t respond, which I guess, is symptomatic of online dating as a whole. I have issues with their search methods: they record education level, but I can’t search on it. Can’t specify multiple race/ethnicities – you can only select one at a time.

    POF has very good Quantcast numbers (4 million) but from my observation of the type of matches on there, they don’t really feel like good matches. I have a profile on there but haven’t been active in searching on there. I asked for some criticisms of my profile and got some feedback but the “experienced” members were really uppity about giving it. The funny thing was looking at their profiles and how they had nothing on them. It is free but I never got responses from the messages I sent.

    To put some perspective to my comments, I go back to it very well may have a lot to do with where I am living being my problem. Perhaps, maybe it is me. I find it very hard to believe that it is THIS hard to find someone to even date casually with all of my positive attributes which are well stated in my profiles.

    Posted 23 Dec 2008 at 10:16 am
  18. Jon wrote:

    Actually, singleguy, location is probably the single biggest factor as to whether a particular site will work for you. I see a lot of canadians on PoF, for example. It’s common sense that if not many people in your area are using the site you won’t have much luck.

    I can say that I have had luck on all three (pof, okcupid and EH). I live in a population dense area, though. The worst luck I’ve had is with Craigslist personals. I think those are a waste of time.

    I chose eharmony because of the matching feature (supposedly scientific) and because I figured the people on it would be more serious about the whole thing. I am not looking for marriage necessarily (not opposed to it if the right person comes along).

    What I found with eh is that most of the women I met WERE looking for marriage. That was definitely their goal. They had no interest in a boyfriend or just dating. To me, you get to the marriage part after dating and being in a relationship. These women seemed to want to fast track the whole thing. That was a huge turnoff for me.

    I also found that the majority of women I interacted with (via email) or went out with were quite picky. They had very specific likes and dislikes and that was also a big turnoff. Nothing wrong with knowing what you like and don’t like, but it often crossed the line into closed-mindedness.

    Posted 25 Dec 2008 at 12:50 pm
  19. sebastian liggeri wrote:

    I did not get rejected.please help me,my pass word is not working i tried to contact eharmoney but it keeps comeing up that i made a mistake when i go to send the message. i havent been abel to get on site for a week.please help. sebastian

    Posted 20 Feb 2009 at 7:07 am
  20. John wrote:

    I think I was like everyone, I went to eharmony because of those commericals they showed on tv and got the same rejection response. Then I was kinda crushed an irriated until I found out a LOT of others are in the same boat.

    As far as I’m concerned, it shouldn’t matter if you’re mentally unstable or not maybe that’s why you’re having a hard time finding a relationship. Maybe the reason why you’ve been married 4 times is because you showed up on ehmarony. And what the hell does being under 20 have to do with anything? It doesn’t.

    People here are adults and can make their own decisions. If they want to go out with someone who is married but is getting separated or whatever, that’s their business. Who knows? Maybe they’re marriage is really in the can and they might find someone a lot better. But Eharmony doesn’t do that, they don’t offer a service, they offer an ideology. Which makes me wonder where they get the money for these commercials.

    As far as I’m concerned anyone who’s having a hard time should just go to their competitors like chemistry.com (which apparently hates eharmony or, or atleast wants to run them out of business) Or find something else that offers another service. There’s 6 billion people on this planet, you can’t expect me to swallow something like a rejection notice just because Eharmony is too afraid of bad publicity or it doesn’t match up with their so called “moral” code or whatever other junk science their following for their matches.

    Posted 27 May 2009 at 12:18 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published, shown nor shared.

In case it isn’t obvious, we are not eHarmony. Your message will not be sent to them, and no, we cannot help you with your account.

Unmoderated: Comments appear after two to five seconds. Have your own topic? Start a new discussion. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting